Boots 'disappointed' by order to remove nasal spray advert

The Advertising Standards Authority ruled that an advert for the defensive properties of Boots Cold and Flu Defence Nasal Spray is not supported by sufficiently robust evidence

boots-underground-ad-380%20%282%29.jpg
ASA: Boots must not suggest the spray can prevent cold and flu (Photo: Adam Jacobs)

Boots is “disappointed” the advertising regulator has ordered it to remove a poster claiming its nasal spray is "clinically proven to defend against cold and flu".

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said the claim on the poster for Boots' Cold and Flu Defence Nasal Spray – which appeared on the London underground – is not supported by “sufficiently robust” evidence.

Boots stressed that the spray, which contains carrageenan, “has been shown in clinical trials to reduce the duration of cold and flu-like symptoms when used as symptoms begin”.

The health and beauty giant has revised its advertising materials “to ensure the intended use of the product is clearly understood”, it told C+D yesterday (November 18).

Boots submitted four studies on the effectiveness of other sprays that contain carrageenan, and one in vitro study on its own spray, the ASA said. The regulator sought “expert advice” before acknowledging that one of these studies provided “some evidence” that a carrageenan nasal spray “could reduce symptoms and duration of viral infections detected in patients, when taken alone and appropriately”.

However, even this study was “not sufficiently robust to show that the nasal spray was clinically proven to treat and prevent colds and flu”, it said in its ruling last week (November 11).

Not intended to prevent cold and flu

The ASA noted Boots’ view that the phrase “defend against” was not intended as a claim that its product could prevent cold or flu infections, but the regulator stressed that consumers would interpret the claim "as a whole" to mean the product has "been shown to have a prophylactic effect”.

The ASA told Boots that the advert must not appear in its current form again, and stressed that its future advertising must not “state or suggest” that the product could be used to treat and prevent cold and flu.

Last month, the ASA upheld a pharmacist’s complaint that an advert claiming that Boots Protect Plus Blue Lenses protect against “harmful” blue light was “misleading”.

Have you ever reported an advert to the ASA?

We want to hear your views, but please express them in the spirit of a constructive, professional debate. For more information about what this means, please click here to see our community principles and information

Sign in or register for free

Latest from News

Fake pharmacist jailed over ‘UK Pharmacy 2U’ Whatsapp group

 
• By 
 • comment

An “illegal online pharmacist” has been jailed for more than 10 years for supplying prescription medication and recreational drugs, including diazepam and cocaine, via a Whatsapp group called “UK Pharmacy 2U”.

Kinnock: No collective action ‘a victory for community pharmacies’

 
• By 
 • comment

The pharmacy minister has said that he is “looking forward to working closely” with the National Pharmacy Association (NPA) now that the body has canned its plans for historic collective action.

Pharmacist struck off over forgery and fake opioid scripts

 
• By 
 • comment

A pharmacist has been struck off the register after being convicted of “fraudulently” creating prescriptions for an opioid pain medicine worth almost £800, following a previous hearing over "similar matters".

More from Multiples