'Pharmacist apprenticeship proposals driven by workforce issues'

Proposals for a pharmacist apprenticeship scheme have been driven by companies looking for solutions to workforce issues in the sector, an apprenticeship expert has said.

pre-reg%20student%20graduation%20pass%20rate_0.jpg
Laura McEwan-Smith: This apprenticeship is not being designed to replace existing training routes

Proposals for pharmacists to qualify through a five-year apprenticeship scheme led by employers have been drawn up in a consultation, which closes on Sunday (April 14), C+D reported this afternoon.

Laura McEwan-Smith, an expert in healthcare apprenticeships, said a “key driver” for the companies behind the proposals include “the government apprenticeship levy and pressure to identify local solutions for pharmacist workforce growth and sustainability”.

The proposal has been developed by a group of at least 10 employers who “reflect all sizes and sectors of employment” for pharmacy, said Ms McEwan-Smith, who sits on Health Education England’s (HEE) healthcare apprenticeship group "Talent for Care".

She was unable to reveal who the pharmacy employers are and stressed that HEE has had no formal role in the development of the pharmacist apprenticeship proposals.

“An alternative training route”

The scheme does not aim to replace pharmacy degrees, she added.

“It will provide an alternative route to train and register…it is not being designed to replace existing funding and training routes.”

Funding

The consultation is at the first of three stages, with the aim of finding out if industry professionals support it. But if the proposals are accepted, a company could take on an unlimited number of apprentices and pay their salaries, Ms McEwan-Smith explained.

The government would help to fund these by enabling organisations that pay an apprenticeship tax – those with a wage bill of over £3 million annually – to claim back the cost of apprentice training* from this tax.

For smaller employers, the government would pay for 90% of the education costs through a “co-investment scheme”.

GPhC accreditation needed

The standards and assessment will “need to be exactly aligned with the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) initial training and education standards”, Ms McEwan-Smith said.

Courses* would have to be accredited by the regulator in the same way as undergraduate degrees, she continued.

Ms McEwan-Smith is not directly involved with the trailblazer group, though she has been involved with government apprenticeships for “many years”.

Read the full consultation and respond here.

*This article was updated to clarify that employers would be able to claim back the cost of apprentice training, not salaries, and courses would have to be accredited by the regulator, not that employers would have to seek accreditation.

Sign in or register for free

Latest from News

New primary care medical director role as 2-year NHSE axing begins

 
• By 
 • comment

Wes Streeting has revealed that the DH is “immediately” working to scrap NHS England (NHSE) and put a new “transformation team” in place – adding that it is in the “very final stages” of concluding a new pharmacy contract deal.

‘Devastating news’: Alliance puts ‘upwards of 845’ jobs at risk

 
• By 
 • comment

Alliance Healthcare has revealed “plans to close” two Midlands service centres and proposed cuts at another, putting hundreds of jobs at risk.

IN FULL: Starmer reveals plans to abolish NHSE

 
• By 
 • comment

Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced that NHS England will be abolished to bring the management of the NHS “back into democratic control”.

More from Education

New pharmacy tech apprentice scheme ‘fully booked’ in one day

 
• By 
 • comment

All of the places on a new pharmacy technician apprenticeship programme have already been filled on the day it launched, organisers have revealed.

Pharmacy student struck off for ‘fabricating’ assessments

 
• By 
 • comment

A postgraduate pharmacy student has been removed from the register after she “falsified” documents during her studies, “invented reasons for absences” and made “widespread clinical failures” during her time of employment.