Why I'll miss primary care pharmacy's focus on structured medication reviews

Patients could lose out now that structured medication reviews (SMRs) are no longer incentivised under the new Network Contract Direct Enhanced Service (DES), warns Chris Grahame

"Our frail and housebound patients could receive less care and attention than they truly deserve"

Reading through the new primary care network (PCN) DES for 2023/24, I can’t help but feel sorrow and mourn the disincentivising of the humble SMR.

Undoubtedly, we need to improve patient access into primary care and the latest PCN DES and investment and impact fund (IIF) will certainly facilitate and incentivise this.

However, I can’t help being sad that we’ve lost an important conduit for managing long-term conditions and engaging with our more vulnerable patients.

Read more: What will the push for access in the new GP contract mean for pharmacists?

The 2022/2023 PCN DES had a specific domain for prescribing, with an emphasis on SMRs.

These were divided into three categories and the points-based system actively incentivised practices within a PCN to all row together for a common purpose, utilising clinical pharmacists and technicians to deliver SMRs for patient benefit.

Over the last three years in my role as a PCN pharmacist, I’ve completed hundreds of SMRs. Without exception, all the housebound patients were appreciative of the contact and care afforded through these consultations.

Read more: PCNs: Golden opportunity or just a pain in the ARRS for community pharmacy?

I was often welcomed with, "Thank you for ringing, it’s nice to feel you’re looking after us."

Many of the older patients, who were stoic and frail, used SMR conversations to mention medicine-related issues that otherwise would have been left unattended.

I would often be told, "I don’t want to bother you as I know how busy you all are."

I regularly found that these consultations would end with a classic telephone 'door handle conversation': "Just before you go I must ask you about..."

Read more: New GP contract marks 'another blow for primary care', says PSNC

These consultations would often throw up medicine safety issues, such as a post myocardial infarction (MI) patient still taking aspirin and ticagrelor 18 months after their emergency, or a frail, 58kg 82-year-old still on apixaban 5mg twice daily.

They might also throw up a medicine safety issue related to a patient with heartburn taking aspirin and clopidogrel but no proton pump inhibitor (PPI), or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) patient who bleeds and bruises very easily and occasionally has haematuria too.

Admittedly, during 2022 and 2023, many SMRs were booked to achieve the IIF threshold. However, in doing so they provided a first-rate platform to have an in-depth review of a patient and their medication, and in doing so really understand the patients or carers’ ideas, concerns and expectations.

The SMR platform allowed many Making Every Contact Count interventions.

Read more: Structured medication reviews mark a huge success for PCN pharmacy

This included annual bloods for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). These were proactively booked to save patients ringing reception in response to a text or letter.

It also ensured patient adherence with a shared decision making agenda and patients were offered and booked in for pneumonia, shingles or flu vaccinations.

In addition, it included numerous lifestyle opportunities to discuss diet, smoking cessation, weight loss and exercise and reminders about inhaler techniques – particularly if a patient had recently switched to a dry powdered inhaler (DPI) – and oral hygiene for an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) user.

We know good practice is for all patients on repeat medications to have regular medication reviews, and various medicines have associated monitoring requirements such as ACEi and ARB annual renal function.

Read more: ‘Chaos’: GPs to ‘signpost’ patients to pharmacies from tomorrow

Nevertheless, I strongly believe that fewer reviews will be delivered by removing the financial incentive and measurement system while eradicating the focus on SMRs.

Ultimately, this could result in our frail and housebound patients receiving less care and attention than they truly deserve.

Chris Grahame is a senior clinical pharmacist, independent prescriber and a Centre for Pharmacy Postgraduate Education (CPPE) pathway mentor

Sign in or register for free

Latest from Opinion

Xrayser: When fear and frustration take hold, what next?

 • comment0

As we head towards the middle of March, I throw my arms up in despair as we still have no news on funding for 2024-2025 and beyond. Social media shows the anger.

What does the future hold for Boots - and its pharmacists?

 
• By 
 • comment0

There will be a huge reliance on the senior team at Boots to deliver whatever plan transpires, and to prepare pharmacy teams for whatever difficult decisions will be coming. And they will be difficult.

Why I’ve launched a campaign against the RPS’s planned changes

 
• By 
 • comment7

‘Vote no’ campaigner Martin Astbury tells C+D why he believes the RPS plans for change represent a shift away from pharmacist leadership and why members should vote against them this week…

More from Analysis

CPE is negotiating in a very difficult and nuanced environment that few will have experienced

 
• By 
 • comment

I also read comments that CPE does not appreciate this critical position, and I fundamentally refute that. Knowing the colleagues, both elected and employed, at CPE as I do, this is far from the case.

opinion

It’s not just funding delays holding pharmacy back, it’s the old dinosaurs too...

 
• By 
 • comment

Community pharmacy is risk adverse, considered, and dare I say it, conservative. But, when it comes to the survival of pharmacy, we can’t afford to let the fear of change – or those resistant to it - hold us back.