Chemist + Druggist is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.


This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. Please do not redistribute without permission.

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Legal view: ‘Why the £111m pharmacy contractor fraud figure is bogus’

NHS England estimates that pharmacy contractor fraud costs the NHS £111m annually, but legal expert David Reissner says this number is bogus

NHS England published its economic crime strategy for 2018-21, dealing with tackling fraud, bribery and corruption, on September 13.

The document says there is a “realistic probability” that pharmacy contractors are responsible for defrauding the NHS in England of £111 million per year through claims for services that haven’t been provided. NHS England’s source for this figure is a report by the NHS Counter Fraud Authority (NHSCFA), using figures from 2016-17, which I have previously commented on. Here are some of the reasons the £111m figure is bogus:

  • The figure doesn’t come from cases in which pharmacists have been found guilty of fraud. They haven’t detected fraud totalling £111m. If they haven’t detected it, how can they know?
  • The estimate was arrived at by looking at total NHS spending in a given year, saying fraud cost the NHS £1.29 billion that year and referring to “historical fraud rates” in England of 1-3.5%. It isn’t clear what any of these figures are based on, but fraud investigators have to justify their existence, so they say it’s based on “intelligence”. Intelligence? As Frankie Howerd might have said: “No, don’t mock.”
  • To arrive at £111m, NHSCFA took an arbitrary 1% of pharmacy funding for the year in question.
  • NHSCFA banded its estimates – you and I might call them ‘guesses’ – under the headings:
  • “almost certain”
  • “highly likely”
  • “probable”
  • “realistic probability”.

The estimate of pharmacy fraud falls under the label “realistic probability”, but this label is disingenuous. We are talking about something that, by definition, is not probable. The label might be accurate if it was changed to “possible”.

Even when NHS England included the NHSCFA estimate in the 2018-21 strategy document, it said that NHSCFA had “the lowest level of confidence” in the figure. NHS England could at least have put the figure in context by quoting NHSCFA’s own strategic intelligence assessment that, with my emphasis, says:

“Intelligence is not fact; it is based upon the processing of information and the inferences drawn from that.”

I’m sure there is some fraud in the NHS, and we all support efforts by NHS England and NHSCFA to eradicate it. However, presenting unreliable figures to smear the professionals working hard to deliver services to patients is not the right way to go about it.

David Reissner is chair of the Pharmacy Law and Ethics Association

Read C+D's exclusive revelation that only one pharmacy owner has been sanctioned for committing fraud in two years, further undermining government claims about the scale of the issue.

Topics

         
Qualified Pharmacy Assistant - Digital Pharmacy
Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire
£11.56 per hour

Apply Now
Latest News & Analysis
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

CD001444

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Thank you for submitting your question. We will respond to you within 2 business days. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel